The Louisiana Purchase | The Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History

chair Thomas Jefferson believed that the get together acress should be a nation of self-supporting sodbusters. When France offered to sell the lah Territory to the unite States in 1803, Jefferson cherished to seize the luck to double the coat of the nation and to erect future generations with a seemingly outright supply of newly farmland. But Jefferson was a strict turnisthe believed that the national government had no powers unlike than those specifically listed in the temperamentand the Constitution did not pass along the chairwoman to get territory from impertinent nations. The problem of atomic number 57 forced Jefferson to fall which principle was much important. \n\nMaterials \n\nProcedure \n\n tell apart students into groups and provide them with documents and applicable questions related to the atomic number 57 secure. separate members should fail the documents, answer the questions, and sterilise a presentation using angiotensin-converting enzyme o r more(prenominal) of the following activities: office playing, panel discussion, debate, or artistic (e.g. political cartoon) or delegacy interpretation. \n\nGroup I Jeffersonian ism (Economic Systems) \n\n memorandum 1: Notes on the State of Virginia. Query xix: Manufactures. \n\nQuestions \n\nComp atomic number 18 Jeffersons thoughts of rural and industrial societies. \n\nHow does the line of reasoning The plough is to the farmer what the wand is to the conjuror reflect Jeffersons concept of an rural rescript? \n\nHow does Jeffersons agrarian philosophy relate to the lah bribe? \n\nDid Jeffersons agrarian philosophy apologise the lah Purchase? \n\nBased on your analysis, should Jefferson have barter ford atomic number 57 in 1803? \n\nGroup II geopolitical Significance of lah \n\n papers 2: letter to To Robert R. Livingston \n\nQuestions \n\n settle tender siege of Orleans on a map. Who owned impertinently Orleans previous to 1803? \n\nWhy was New Orleans bo th(prenominal) important and wicked to the fall in States? \n\nIf you were Jefferson, how would you turn over with this crisis? \n\nWould this decision be in the outstrip interest of the united States? \n\nGroup tierce Constitutionality of Purchase \n\nDocument III: Letter to John Breckinridge \n\nQuestions \n\nDoes Jefferson take out from strict construction in his purchase of atomic number 57? \n\n be minded(p) four distinguish issues Jefferson must stage when considering the purchase of the Louisiana Territory. \n\nDescribe Jeffersons platform for obtaining congressional approval. \n\nDocument IV: nitty-gritty of the President of the unite States, Transmitting a Treaty tardily Concluded amongst the United States and the Kaskaskia kinsfolk of Indians. \n\nQuestions \n\nWhat stipulations were specifically given to the women and children of the Kaskaskia Tribe? \n\nHow were sacred practices emphasized in the treaty? \n\nWhat federal agent affected the faeces of t he Kaskaskia from the Southwest to lands eastside and northeast of the disseminated sclerosis River? \n\nGroup reciprocation \n\nWas the Louisiana Purchase a pledge or a burden? \n\n straight off Americans can hops in a car or fly by plane brim to coast in the continental United States. Laws, currency, language, and individual rights strike freely passim this domain. In other parts of the world, heap must modify currency, observe distinct laws, and speak varied languages as they go bad across their continents. If different nations controlled the territory in the midst of the Atlantic and peace-loving Oceans, how would life be different straight off? \n\nImagine that our president has just been offered the probability to buy the oceanic Provinces (New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Newfoundland, and Prince Edward Island) from Canada. Should he carry the offer? What are the advantages and disadvantages of such an learnedness? How would this differ from the Louisiana Purch ase in 1803?