'Ethical Dimension in Religion Essay\r'

'Worldview influences the general scope of godliness. piety cannnot sufficiently stand as a disjoint discipline from religeon. An attempt to separate morality from religeon cannot be entirely successful. Utilitarianism has been the close to powerful and honourable system in the modern times exerting influence cross modes the homo. It was propagated most eloquently by whoremaster Staurt Mill (1806-1873). Its key dimension is to test moral action by the rapture it produces or the suffering it eliminates while maximise benefits to the replete(p)st possible au pass bynce.\r\nThis idea finds a hotshot in the scientific hu soldieryist who feels that relationships amidst various(prenominal)s form the basis for the determine an individual should hold. On the separate hand, Marxism vouches for collective morality where exclusively actions that lead to the prosperity of the collectivistic system be considered good and consequently mor al wholenessy acceptable. The dominant moralitys in the world have many another(prenominal) alike(p)ities pertaining to moral idea and conduct. They include unctions, â€Å"not to steal, not to kill, not to have certain kinds of sexual relations,” (Smart, 2000, p. 107) among others.\r\n near of these rules substantially make a motionless society possible because without them, the society would angle of dip into a state of anarchy, especially if these values are not upheld by a critical mass. It Is also clear that the actual particulars of these standards as expessed in execute are different, driven by different demand and environmental circumstances. Arguably, Islam and Christianity have a wide area of overlap in ethical dimension as expressed twain in doctrine and in practice. The counterbalance area of considerable ethical compatibility amongst Christianity and Islam is on the universality of mankind.\r\nThe central Christian message of love intent for all earth places a demand on all practicing Christians to regard human living exceedingly and can explain the vast human-centred efforts pursued in expression of religion. This explains much(prenominal) sacrifice and devotion to the poor and the frame by well-known persons such as the late mother Teresa of Calcutta. Muslims on the other hand have a religeous art to give alms to the poor as sensation of the key pillars of faith, which is an expression of universal union. Numeous Muslim aid organisations also exist to quench poverty and suffering among the disadvantaged in the society.\r\nWhen approached from the standpoint Comparative religious ethics, many similarities are operaten in the actual practice of the two faiths. While Christianity does not pull up stakes for blessed wars as expressly as Islam, the concept of just wars found its way into Christian thin female monarch and was the key rationalisation behind the crucades. It became an expression of aces faith to roll up arms and fight for the faith dur ing the crusades as compared to the early church strength where military service was considered wrong.\r\nA semblance of the characterts of ethical dimension upheld by Christianity and Islam moldiness include a look at the founders, their philosophy of human relationships, and the employment of man towards creator. Christianity has Christ as its face. He preached love and despite be diety gave himself up to be crucified. He shed nobody’s blood in his entire life but his own blood was shed. As if to immortalize his message taped for the forgiveness of those who crucified him. He nonetheless taught that he would be culmination back, this time not as a graceful redeemer, but as king and Judge.\r\nChristianity therefore gets its message of love for all from this picture of Christ. All human life is considered sacred, thence created in Gods image, and hence in the image of Christ. Christians, in following this trope are expected to love their enemies and to pray for them. In the area of marriage, a Christian may marry only one wife. Further more, it is generally difficult to proceed with fall apart as a Christian as Christianity is generally averse to divorce. The Prophet Muhammad is the face of Islam. He was, â€Å"not just a man of God; he was the decent diplomat, statesman, and general” (Smart, 2000, p.\r\n110). This has influenced Muslim ethics so as to accommodate such concepts as holy war (Jihad) against those who impede the extend of Islam, and it goes further to actually reward those who see to it that such persons are eliminated, complete with insuarance for those who die in the process, being regarded as Holy warriors. Islam advocates for universal brother hood and this is enforced by the giving of alms, which basically raises fearfulness for fellow man. Islam builds on this concept of brotherhood whereby all Muslims consider themselves pilgrims, with none having a superior status before Allah.\r\nAs Christian cultures have bec ome increasingly westernised, divorce has become more and more acceptable without much conflict with faith. This compares fast with the official Muslim position on divorce. A Christian is required to participate in certain rituals such as baptism and communion as a handicraft to God, his love for fellow makind notwithstanding. Islam places a similar demand on its adherants where some acts are purely devotional and are considered duty to God, such as pilgrimage to Mecca.\r\nIt is indeed clear that although the details vary between Islam and Christianity, the practice of the two faiths is strickingly similar and does not differentiate them sufficiently from each other. herald points out, â€Å"One’s religious being is more than whether or not one is part of some organized religion” (Bode, 1996). References Bode B. A. (2006). Dimensions of Religion: The Ethical Dimension. July tenth 2010, www. quuf. org/sermons/archives/2006-2007/ethical. pdf Smart, N. (2000) . Worldvi ews, Crosscultural Explorations of Human Beliefs, 3rd Ed,\r\n'